PropVR AI → Craft

2026 · Initial MVP delivered to PropVR’s team

I built the initial 22-tool AI MVP across five workflow studios. PropVR’s team used that product and technical foundation to develop Craft, a public creative platform for AEC workflows.

My role
Product architecture, interaction model, technical foundation and initial implementation
Period
2026
Status
Initial MVP delivered to PropVR’s team

Visit Craft (external site, opens in a new tab)

Craft public homepage presenting its AEC creative workflow and a waterfront development shown as massing and a finished render
Craft, accessed September 2026. Public homepage capture. Current platform by the PropVR Technology team, not the initial MVP.
Project storyTHE WORK

The problem

Architects, interior designers, developers and property marketers were already using AI, but the workflow was fragmented. A general prompt box could produce a useful image. It could not guide someone through concept development, material edits, staging, panoramic media, animation and delivery on its own.

The product question was not which model to expose. It was how AI should fit the way AEC teams already move work through a project.

The foundation

I built an internal MVP with 22 specialist tools organised across five workflow studios. Each tool owned a clear job, input contract and output. The product routed tasks to suitable models rather than treating one model as the whole product.

The initial stack used Next.js 15, Tailwind CSS 4, AI SDK integrations, fal.ai, OpenAI and Gemini-family image and vision models. Production persistence, real billing and account infrastructure were deliberately outside the MVP scope. State was client-side. The job was to establish the workflow structure, tool boundaries, model routing and user experience for a team to extend.

Why specialist tools came first

A blank prompt box gives the model freedom and leaves the user responsible for the rest. Many professional tasks need constrained inputs, useful defaults, predictable output formats and a clear next action.

The studio structure made the lifecycle visible. A user could choose a stage, run a focused capability, inspect the result and carry it forward. The design intent was to make prompt construction an implementation detail rather than a prerequisite for using the product.

The trade-offs

Choice What it made possible What it did not solve
Specialist tools Clearer input and output contracts for each task End-to-end coordination across a whole project
Model routing Choose a capability suited to the job A guarantee that every generated result is correct
Client-side state A small, quickly extensible MVP scope Durable projects, production accounts or real billing
Five workflow studios A recognisable way into the tool set Proof of production adoption or measured business impact

The handoff

The MVP was handed to PropVR’s team as a foundation to extend. My contribution was the initial product system and implementation. The wider team developed, productionized and expanded that foundation into the current platform.

Initial PropVR AI MVP: Pranshul Chandhok. Current Craft platform: PropVR Technology team.

The product lesson

A model can generate an output. A product has to decide what the output means, what must remain fixed, who approves it, and what happens next.

The MVP established a way to arrange specialist capabilities around AEC work. Its central lesson was to define the task, the input contract and the next decision before choosing the model.

From an internal foundation to Craft

The MVP was handed to PropVR’s team as a foundation to extend. The current team developed, productionized, and expanded it into Craft.

Craft’s tools index now lists 30+ production tools live across six studios: Concept, Design, Immersive, Animation, Refine, and Marketing. Direct tools can be used individually. Agentic 1.0 and Arc 1.0 are in early access, adding outcome planning and shared project context around those tools.

That is the current PropVR Technology team’s platform. It should not be read as a retroactive description of the MVP I built.

  1. Initial MVP22 tools across five studiosPranshul Chandhok
  2. Team handoffProduct and technical foundationPropVR Technology team takes it forward
  3. Current Craft30+ production toolsLive across six studios
  4. Agentic 1.0 + Arc 1.0Early accessOutcome planning and project context
Product scope, then and now
Initial PropVR AI MVPCurrent Craft platform
22 tools across five workflow studios30+ production tools live across six studios
User selects a specialist toolDirect tools plus agent-planned workflows
Client-side prototype stateShared project context through Arc in early access
Proved workflow structure, tool boundaries, and model routingAdds production operations, approval, consistency, and cost controls

Availability checked: .

Go deeper

Sources and links