Making tools easier to steer
Field Note · 23 August 2026
In design software and AI tools, I keep coming back to a practical question. Can someone change the result without having to start over?
An AI-generated room can look convincing and still be difficult to work with. A designer might like the room but want to change the sofa. A homeowner might want the same layout with different materials. Starting again from a prompt can lose the parts they wanted to keep.
That is one of the problems we’re working through with Designesto. I want people to be able to develop an idea over several revisions, compare directions, and keep track of how they arrived at a choice.
The level of control needs to suit the person using it. A professional designer may want precise choices that would make a homeowner’s first attempt unnecessarily complicated. I don’t think one crowded screen solves both needs.
I’ve run into related questions in other work. In IRA VR, the student’s experience was only part of the product. The teacher also needed to choose content, manage a lesson, and understand what students had done. Giving the teacher useful controls changed how the experience could be used in a classroom.
For AI tools, I pay particular attention to recovery. Someone should be able to reject a result, return to an earlier version, or change one detail without wondering what else will disappear.
Those features can look ordinary beside the first generated image. They matter a great deal when someone is trying to finish a piece of work.